Wednesday, February 22, 2023

Wealth Is Evil

Right. I know.

Not evil for me you tell yourself, only for everyone else. Maybe.

But no — no maybe. It's not a maybe thing.

Wealth is evil.

Before the development of agriculture people had wars, but they were mostly symbolic, more like football. People did a little posturing, some hooting and insult-tossing, got it out of their systems, and went home to catch the latest on TV.

There was no ownership of land because, well, people had to keep moving and couldn't own things like land.

But after agriculture got a good start, there were surpluses.

Culture exploded. Land became something to own. Slavery and a lot of other things came into being, because people lived lives in fixed places and could afford to buy and sell anything, including one another.

Monogamy became both relevant and important when people had valuables worth acquiring and worth keeping, and gained the idea of passing on wealth.

Now we have entire armies composed of mercenaries, whole industries devoted to counting out wealth, socking it away, and defending it.

The wealthiest 1% of Americans have as much income as the poorest 50% of Americans, and own as much, in dollar terms, as the poorest 90% of Americans.

That's you and me, Bub.

I'm willing to work for things but the game changes when no matter how much you work it ceases to matter because nothing will change.

I don't know what you call it.

I call it evil.

 


Have anything worth adding? Then try sosayseff@nullabigmail.com
Me? Only slightly evil.

 

Etc...

so says eff: sporadic spurts of grade eff distraction
definitions: outdoor terms
fiyh: dave's little guide to ultralight backpacking stoves
boyb: dave's little guide to backpacks
snorpy bits: nibbling away at your sanity
last seen receding: missives from a certain mobile homer
noseyjoe: purposefully poking my proboscis into technicals

Wednesday, February 15, 2023

Request #112766

Intro

I recently received a new Darter Pro laptop from System76. I wasn't able to boot it up from a USB stick. I got only as far as an empty, black screen containing a prompt that said "GNU Grub >". I could find no information on how to proceed. I contacted System76 support. That was weeks ago. I think it's over, but I just got another email.

 

The Question

Request #112766: How would you rate the support you received?

Hello [ Customer-Name ]

We'd love to hear what you think of our customer service. Please take a moment to answer one simple question by clicking either link below:

How would you rate the support you received?

Good, I'm satisfied [link]

Bad, I'm unsatisfied [link]

Here's a reminder of what this request was about: [ Tedious parts follow...]

 

The Reply

It seems that the adage "Things work best with new software and old hardware" applies here, since my problem apparently came from new hardware and old software, at least as far as the OS kernel is concerned.

I most wanted to try Linux Mint Debian Edition (LMDE5), which is based on Debian Stable, and has an older OS kernel, but it looks like the kernel is too old to work with my new Darter Pro (darp8).

Combined with a lack of time (maybe 2 to 3 hours a week to devote to this) and my lack of experience (around once every five years or so trying to install an OS), I got lost in a hunt for the solution to this one problem rather than just trying another distribution. The others I eventually tried to live boot all worked. (Fedora MATE, Linux Mint Xfce, Linux Mint MATE, MX Xfce, Manjaro MATE).

Maybe I'm being dense again, but it seems that the dead end I arrived at with LMDE5 should be obvious to those involved in customer support. "Oh, that -- outdated kernel. Try a distribution with kernel X or newer. You should be OK." But I didn't see that. Instead this took weeks. Isn't there a cheatsheet hanging on the wall? Isn't there a quickie decision tree? ("If situation A, resolution is this, else goto B...")

I can say that I am deeply annoyed at something, what I'm going to call the poor online documentation at System76. It's scattered, sloppy, hard to search, and incomplete. Take this: "Secure Boot. Secure boot must be disabled before installing Pop!_OS. Secure boot can be disabled in the BIOS of most computers; however, the process to disable secure boot will vary by laptop and motherboard model." At https://support.system76.com/articles/install-pop

As far as I can tell, this is the only mention of "Secure Boot" in all of System76 documentation. All I could find anyway. Doesn't this hardware company have instructions on how to do this, if needed, for its own products?

But I guess it's not relevant, because I didn't and couldn't do anything about it, and got the laptop to boot a live image, but who can say? Not me. Doing this once every five years or so isn't often enough to be familiar enough with all the mental balls that have to be juggled. But relevant or not, there is a mention of Secure Boot but no definition of it, and no explanation of it, and no set of instructions on how to deal with it, so I would have been stuck in the mud at the Wild Turtle Farm. At least I'm happy that it wasn't relevant. (I think.)

We'll see if I can actually do a full install of a distribution that matches my needs. If not, maybe I can use the laptop for parts. That new Starfighter looks interesting too.

 

Coda

A binary thumb-pointing toward the sky or toward the dirt didn't seem relevant. This is why I can't take surveys. "No, no — you can only answer 'A' or 'B' or 'C'. Those are your only choices. Our process can handle only multiple choice, pre-adjudicated responses." [Wild Turtle Farm]

 


Have anything worth adding? Then try sosayseff@nullabigmail.com
Me? Recently frustrated.

 

Etc...

so says eff: sporadic spurts of grade eff distraction
definitions: outdoor terms
fiyh: dave's little guide to ultralight backpacking stoves
boyb: dave's little guide to backpacks
snorpy bits: nibbling away at your sanity
last seen receding: missives from a certain mobile homer
noseyjoe: purposefully poking my proboscis into technicals

Wednesday, February 8, 2023

Personal, Personal, Personal

Communication. It's an art. It's necessary. It's easy. It's hard. It depends.

You can't escape communication, and you don't want to. You need it, I need it, every person needs it, every business needs it. It's really all we have. But it can kill you if you turn your back on it.

One thing you can do is to keep it personal. Make all conversations unique. Own them. Act as though you mean it, and do. In fact, this is what you have to do. Otherwise you lose people.

It always takes at least two to talk, and to talk you need something to say, and you need trust, and a common goal. And you need to work at it.

Bad communication is easy. Just don't try. Mumble. Treat people like you don't care, which you don't, if bad communication is your goal.

Bad communication is avoidable communication. It's avoidable contact. It's avoidance in every way possible. Don't talk, don't write, don't answer the phone. Skip eye contact. Drone. Never smile. Join the undead. Escape reality. Escape involvement. Escape context. Escape business. Be vague. Be forgettable.

Bad communication is pointless communication. It never stands its ground, or gains any. Say something today and something else tomorrow. Forget. Make random noises with your mouth, put random words into your ads, build a random web site. It doesn't matter. Whatever.

Make no sense. Equivocate. Break promises. Represent nothing. Claim you didn't mean it. Concede the high ground. Keep at it until you are all alone. That's your measure of success.

Bad communication is simple communication. It's so simple that you don't need to think about it at all, ever. It's really that simple. You never need to worry about what you say or do because it doesn't matter. You can do anything. Or do nothing. OK either way.

If you want to communicate poorly then you don't work at it. Who wants work? Not you. You want to keep it simple. As simple as possible. Simpler.

No need to make sure you're being understood. Or make sure that you have understood. Or that you're making sense. Sounds like a plan, which may be a sign of too much work. Why bother? Try less, less hard, less often. Give up.

Bad communication fits all sizes. No tailoring a message to the audience. Stock phrases work great. After all, who cares anyway? Too much like work. Didn't we already cover that work thing?

Remember that you're going for the steady state of zero communication, zero contact, zero activity, zero complexity, zero gain. So don't bother checking who you're talking to or about what. Make something up. Anything. It will do.

Then, once you've learned this easy technique, keep it handy. Pull it out for any and all occasions. Why worry about who you're talking to? They're only people, and people are people. All the same. Numbers. If they don't like you they can go somewhere else.

It's not as though you want to have a relationship with anyone. Or like, care. Any place, any time, any people — doesn't matter. Bad communication works on all of them.

On the other hand you might consider another point of view.

  • That no matter what you do, you are communicating something. You can't avoid it.
  • That whomever you are dealing with will remember what you said and expect you to stand by it.
  • That communicating takes work, and thought, and perseverance, and integrity.
  • That if you want customers, you have to treat them with respect, as unique individuals with unique problems to solve.

So then, do you expect your web site to communicate well or not?

If not, then why have a web site?

But if you have a web site, why not have a great web site?

Remember, you can throw a few dollars at a wall and get nothing more than flying shadows. A good site doesn't cost much more than a bad one, and you get a relationship at no extra cost. A solid communicating relationship with someone you can trust, who does good work, and who will help you gain and hold business rather than losing it.

Because the downside of bad communication isn't simply gaining less. It's losing what you already have.

Or was that what you wanted?

 


Have anything worth adding? Then try sosayseff@nullabigmail.com
Me? Still trying to make sense.

 

Etc...

so says eff: sporadic spurts of grade eff distraction
definitions: outdoor terms
fiyh: dave's little guide to ultralight backpacking stoves
boyb: dave's little guide to backpacks
snorpy bits: nibbling away at your sanity
last seen receding: missives from a certain mobile homer
noseyjoe: purposefully poking my proboscis into technicals

Wednesday, February 1, 2023

Big Government, Big Business, And Poor Little You

Government is a tool, to be used, or not, rightly or wrongly. It has no inherent value, no goodness or badness by itself, but it has great utility, and can do either great good or great harm, or both simultaneously.

It is the responsibility of citizens to control and run their government. Complaining is both useless and pointless. Complaining about something that government does or does not do is like complaining that you have five fingers on each hand and so you don't know where to have lunch. It is completely irrational.

Shrinking government, or eliminating it entirely actually means converting from public government to private government. There is never a vacuum. Government will not go away by wishing it to. There will always be someone in charge of everything. If big public government were to go away it would be replaced by big private government. At that point citizens would lose the last bit of control and decline to the level of servants.

There is no free enterprise, never has been, and never will be. It's all about power and what power can get away with. Any segment of the economy left unregulated will be controlled by those with the power to control it. Unregulated economies move to monopoly.

Business does not result in better service or lower cost through competition. The way to make money in business is to charge the absolute maximum that the market will bear. Monopoly is vastly more efficient because it does less while charging more, and does not have to think.

There is no trickle-down economy. Never has been, never will be. All economies, especially the most lightly regulated, are trickle-up. Wealth always flows from the poorest to the richest. That is how the rich get to be rich. The rich do not create wealth, they take it. If the rich created wealth then everyone would get trickled and eventually be rich because wealth would overflow endlessly.

Money is useless by itself. It has no inherent value or utility. Money is stored power, and operates only by the rules of social convention. It is useful only for what it can cause to happen. Paying for something is equivalent to using force, but more compact and cleaner — more polite, if you will. Money is also more portable than troops or weapons. Not so messy.

Wealth is always redistributed. This is what economies do, whether or not they use money. It is not wrong for a government to move wealth from one part of the population to another, nor is it right. It is only an operation, sometimes tactical, sometimes strategic, for accomplishing societal goals. If private entities accumulate wealth, that is also wealth redistribution in the form of sequestering, of concentrating power. If left unchecked then power will be concentrated enough to destroy public government and replace it with private government.

If the wealthiest 2% of Americans control as much wealth as the poorest 90%, then the other 8% constitute the middle class, and they have no real effect on the economy or on politics. Meanwhile that bottom 98% continues to grow in numbers and shrink in wealth, and power, as their real income falls. This process will take us back to feudalism, when at least 98% of the population was equivalent to farm animals, at best.

 


Have anything worth adding? Then try sosayseff@nullabigmail.com
Me? Being a smartass again. It's kind of my calling.

 

Etc...

so says eff: sporadic spurts of grade eff distraction
definitions: outdoor terms
fiyh: dave's little guide to ultralight backpacking stoves
boyb: dave's little guide to backpacks
snorpy bits: nibbling away at your sanity
last seen receding: missives from a certain mobile homer
noseyjoe: purposefully poking my proboscis into technicals